Maine Canceling Delica Registration

I think part of the issue may be that the L300 Delica Truck looks a whole lot like a Mitsubishi Kei class miniTruck in pictures.

truck2.jpegkei.jpeg

I've also read that the RI is just hearsay at this point (based on calls to unfamiliar workers)... there's only one office in RI that does import registrations.
 
This just in:

STATE OF MAINE
Department of Public Safety
Maine State Police
Traffic Safety
20 State House Station
Augusta, Maine
04333-0020

JANET T. MILLS BRUCE G. SCOTT COL. JOHN E. COTE GOVERNOR LIEUTENANT CHIEF
MICHAEL SAUSCHUCK RANDALL C. MCKIEL LT. COL. BILL S. HARWOOD
COMMISSIONER SUPERVISOR DEPUTY CHIEF


To Whom it may concern,

Please accept this general correspondence as the Maine State’s Polices response to the numerous Mitsubishi Delicaand other related inquiries of non-conforming vehicles. Due to the high number of inquiries it is more efficient for me to respond to all of you at once. Sorry for the lack of personalization and if I miss any of your specific questions. You will find relevant portions of rules and laws pertinent to this discussion copied and pasted throughout my response for your convenience.

First let me start by saying, we agree with the Bureau of Motor Vehicles’ (BMV) decision to request that all registrations for any non-conforming vehicles be recalled immediately. The law (Title 29-A section 354) doesn’t allow for vehicles to be registered for highway use if they are “off road vehicles” as defined by Title 29-A section 101 subsection 47-A. Statute also prohibits the operation of “off road vehicles” on a public way, per Title 29-A section 2092. Having said that, this isn’t specifically about the Mitsubishi Delica, this pertains to any vehicle that meets the definition of an “off-road vehicle.” As you will read in the law copied below, vehicles that don’t meet the inspection standards of Chapter 15 and that are not a mopeds or motorcycles are considered “off road vehicle(s).”

47-A. Off-road vehicle. "Off-road vehicle" means a motor vehicle that, because of the vehicle's
design and configuration, does not meet the inspection standards of chapter 15 and that is not a moped
or motorcycle.
[PL 2005, c. 577, §6 (NEW).]

§354. Off-road vehicles
Off-road vehicles may not be registered in accordance with this Title. [PL 2005, c. 577, §8
(NEW).]

§2092. Operation of off-road vehicles
1. Operation prohibited. Unless the specific type of off-road vehicle is authorized to be operated
on a public way by this or any other Title, an off-road vehicle may not be operated on a public way or
parking area.
[PL 2005, c. 577, §34 (NEW).]
2. Violation. A person who operates an off-road vehicle in violation of subsection 1 commits a
traffic infraction.
[PL 2005, c. 577, §34 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 2005, c. 577, §34 (NEW).

So, the real question that needs to be answered when evaluating the current law is, does the vehicle meet the standards set forth in the Maine Motor Vehicle Inspection Manual (MMVIM)? If the vehicle does not meet the standards set forth in the MMVIM it cannot be registered or operated on a public way. The MMVIM carries the weight of law, as Title 29-A section 1769 grants authority to the Chief of the Maine State Police to adopt rules for the administration and enforcement of Chapter 15. The MMVIM are those rules promulgated by that statute and The Maine Administrative Procedure Act. The BMV is obligated to recall any registrations that are issued to vehicles improperly or illegally, once the issue is brought to their attention. To assert that you have already registered a vehicle one or more times is not a defense to a clear violation of law. Also, to assert that vehicle has passed an inspection one or more times is not accurate, it may have received an inspection sticker in error, but it couldn’t have passed an inspection if the vehicle does not meet the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, The EPA pollutant requirements, or the NHTSA DOT crash testing standards. A vehicle registered in error (contrary to law) or a vehicle that received an inspection sticker in error does not guarantee the owner of the vehicle rights to operate an “off road vehicle” on a public way. Once the error is discovered it must be remedied by immediately withdrawing the registration and removing the inspection sticker. The BMV nor the State Police has the authority to allow anyone to violate the law, so we cannot grant exceptions or grant extensions. This decision is not based on new laws or rules nor is arbitrary or capricious. The laws governing “off road vehicles” has been on the books for over a decade. There have been several instances over the years that I am aware of, where BMV has been forced to withdraw registrations based on similar circumstances.

MMVIM
16 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
222 BUREAU OF STATE POLICE
SECTION 170: CLASSES A & E MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTION STANDARDS
SUMMARY: This section describes the inspection procedures, standards, and parts of the vehicle that must be inspected for class A and E vehicles. This section also establishes the standards for rejecting the vehicles for inspection. All vehicles inspected in the State of Maine must have met all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, Environmental Protection Agency pollutant requirements and National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration crash testing requirements at the time of manufacture, unless otherwise authorized by law.


The legal process through NHTSA to import these vehicles into the country is irrelevant. That is a federal exemption for importation but does not affect the laws of each state that govern the registration and inspections of said vehicles.

In closing, the legislature this year voted to enact LD 1433 which added clarity to the law that already existed and strengthens our opinion. It is worth repeating, that bill does not change the current law, it only added language to the definitions in statute to clarify what an “off road vehicle” is. It further clarifies that an “off road vehicle” can’t be registered as an antique auto, antique motorcycle, a custom vehicle or a passenger car. That law becomes effective on October 18th this year but doesn’t change the current requirements and therefore waiting until October 18th to comply is not an option that can be offered by the BMV or the State Police.


With respect,

Lt. Bruce Scott

Lt. Bruce Scott
Commander, Traffic Safety Unit
Maine State Police
 
This just in:

STATE OF MAINE
Department of Public Safety
Maine State Police
Traffic Safety
20 State House Station
Augusta, Maine
04333-0020

JANET T. MILLS BRUCE G. SCOTT COL. JOHN E. COTE GOVERNOR LIEUTENANT CHIEF
MICHAEL SAUSCHUCK RANDALL C. MCKIEL LT. COL. BILL S. HARWOOD
COMMISSIONER SUPERVISOR DEPUTY CHIEF


To Whom it may concern,

Please accept this general correspondence as the Maine State’s Polices response to the numerous Mitsubishi Delicaand other related inquiries of non-conforming vehicles. Due to the high number of inquiries it is more efficient for me to respond to all of you at once. Sorry for the lack of personalization and if I miss any of your specific questions. You will find relevant portions of rules and laws pertinent to this discussion copied and pasted throughout my response for your convenience.

First let me start by saying, we agree with the Bureau of Motor Vehicles’ (BMV) decision to request that all registrations for any non-conforming vehicles be recalled immediately. The law (Title 29-A section 354) doesn’t allow for vehicles to be registered for highway use if they are “off road vehicles” as defined by Title 29-A section 101 subsection 47-A. Statute also prohibits the operation of “off road vehicles” on a public way, per Title 29-A section 2092. Having said that, this isn’t specifically about the Mitsubishi Delica, this pertains to any vehicle that meets the definition of an “off-road vehicle.” As you will read in the law copied below, vehicles that don’t meet the inspection standards of Chapter 15 and that are not a mopeds or motorcycles are considered “off road vehicle(s).”

47-A. Off-road vehicle. "Off-road vehicle" means a motor vehicle that, because of the vehicle's
design and configuration, does not meet the inspection standards of chapter 15 and that is not a moped
or motorcycle.
[PL 2005, c. 577, §6 (NEW).]

§354. Off-road vehicles
Off-road vehicles may not be registered in accordance with this Title. [PL 2005, c. 577, §8
(NEW).]

§2092. Operation of off-road vehicles
1. Operation prohibited. Unless the specific type of off-road vehicle is authorized to be operated
on a public way by this or any other Title, an off-road vehicle may not be operated on a public way or
parking area.
[PL 2005, c. 577, §34 (NEW).]
2. Violation. A person who operates an off-road vehicle in violation of subsection 1 commits a
traffic infraction.
[PL 2005, c. 577, §34 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 2005, c. 577, §34 (NEW).

So, the real question that needs to be answered when evaluating the current law is, does the vehicle meet the standards set forth in the Maine Motor Vehicle Inspection Manual (MMVIM)? If the vehicle does not meet the standards set forth in the MMVIM it cannot be registered or operated on a public way. The MMVIM carries the weight of law, as Title 29-A section 1769 grants authority to the Chief of the Maine State Police to adopt rules for the administration and enforcement of Chapter 15. The MMVIM are those rules promulgated by that statute and The Maine Administrative Procedure Act. The BMV is obligated to recall any registrations that are issued to vehicles improperly or illegally, once the issue is brought to their attention. To assert that you have already registered a vehicle one or more times is not a defense to a clear violation of law. Also, to assert that vehicle has passed an inspection one or more times is not accurate, it may have received an inspection sticker in error, but it couldn’t have passed an inspection if the vehicle does not meet the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, The EPA pollutant requirements, or the NHTSA DOT crash testing standards. A vehicle registered in error (contrary to law) or a vehicle that received an inspection sticker in error does not guarantee the owner of the vehicle rights to operate an “off road vehicle” on a public way. Once the error is discovered it must be remedied by immediately withdrawing the registration and removing the inspection sticker. The BMV nor the State Police has the authority to allow anyone to violate the law, so we cannot grant exceptions or grant extensions. This decision is not based on new laws or rules nor is arbitrary or capricious. The laws governing “off road vehicles” has been on the books for over a decade. There have been several instances over the years that I am aware of, where BMV has been forced to withdraw registrations based on similar circumstances.

MMVIM
16 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
222 BUREAU OF STATE POLICE
SECTION 170: CLASSES A & E MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTION STANDARDS
SUMMARY: This section describes the inspection procedures, standards, and parts of the vehicle that must be inspected for class A and E vehicles. This section also establishes the standards for rejecting the vehicles for inspection. All vehicles inspected in the State of Maine must have met all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, Environmental Protection Agency pollutant requirements and National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration crash testing requirements at the time of manufacture, unless otherwise authorized by law.


The legal process through NHTSA to import these vehicles into the country is irrelevant. That is a federal exemption for importation but does not affect the laws of each state that govern the registration and inspections of said vehicles.

In closing, the legislature this year voted to enact LD 1433 which added clarity to the law that already existed and strengthens our opinion. It is worth repeating, that bill does not change the current law, it only added language to the definitions in statute to clarify what an “off road vehicle” is. It further clarifies that an “off road vehicle” can’t be registered as an antique auto, antique motorcycle, a custom vehicle or a passenger car. That law becomes effective on October 18th this year but doesn’t change the current requirements and therefore waiting until October 18th to comply is not an option that can be offered by the BMV or the State Police.


With respect,

Lt. Bruce Scott

Lt. Bruce Scott
Commander, Traffic Safety Unit
Maine State Police
Damn, they're going for all grey market vehicles. Shots fired. I hope there are some rich vintage Euro owners up there who want to lobby against this.
 
Damn, they're going for all grey market vehicles. Shots fired. I hope there are some rich vintage Euro owners up there who want to lobby against this.
It seems like they're going for all grey market vehicles, but so far it's only Delicas and ex-military HUMVEEs. What are they waiting for in regard to all the other vehicles that fall under the 'off road vehicle' catch all? The application of the law has, so far, been very subjective.
 
It seems like they're going for all grey market vehicles, but so far it's only Delicas and ex-military HUMVEEs. What are they waiting for in regard to all the other vehicles that fall under the 'off road vehicle' catch all? The application of the law has, so far, been very subjective.
If they do continue registering other imports, it could be argued they're applying the law arbitrarily to target specific groups. If not, then they're probably trying to divide and conquer. Go for one or two groups at a time so they don't band together and mount political opposition. What's the lowest elected official in Maine that has a say in this?
 
This just in:

STATE OF MAINE
Department of Public Safety
Maine State Police
Traffic Safety
20 State House Station
Augusta, Maine
04333-0020

JANET T. MILLS BRUCE G. SCOTT COL. JOHN E. COTE GOVERNOR LIEUTENANT CHIEF
MICHAEL SAUSCHUCK RANDALL C. MCKIEL LT. COL. BILL S. HARWOOD
COMMISSIONER SUPERVISOR DEPUTY CHIEF


To Whom it may concern,

Please accept this general correspondence as the Maine State’s Polices response to the numerous Mitsubishi Delicaand other related inquiries of non-conforming vehicles. Due to the high number of inquiries it is more efficient for me to respond to all of you at once. Sorry for the lack of personalization and if I miss any of your specific questions. You will find relevant portions of rules and laws pertinent to this discussion copied and pasted throughout my response for your convenience.

First let me start by saying, we agree with the Bureau of Motor Vehicles’ (BMV) decision to request that all registrations for any non-conforming vehicles be recalled immediately. The law (Title 29-A section 354) doesn’t allow for vehicles to be registered for highway use if they are “off road vehicles” as defined by Title 29-A section 101 subsection 47-A. Statute also prohibits the operation of “off road vehicles” on a public way, per Title 29-A section 2092. Having said that, this isn’t specifically about the Mitsubishi Delica, this pertains to any vehicle that meets the definition of an “off-road vehicle.” As you will read in the law copied below, vehicles that don’t meet the inspection standards of Chapter 15 and that are not a mopeds or motorcycles are considered “off road vehicle(s).”

47-A. Off-road vehicle. "Off-road vehicle" means a motor vehicle that, because of the vehicle's
design and configuration, does not meet the inspection standards of chapter 15 and that is not a moped
or motorcycle.
[PL 2005, c. 577, §6 (NEW).]

§354. Off-road vehicles
Off-road vehicles may not be registered in accordance with this Title. [PL 2005, c. 577, §8
(NEW).]

§2092. Operation of off-road vehicles
1. Operation prohibited. Unless the specific type of off-road vehicle is authorized to be operated
on a public way by this or any other Title, an off-road vehicle may not be operated on a public way or
parking area.
[PL 2005, c. 577, §34 (NEW).]
2. Violation. A person who operates an off-road vehicle in violation of subsection 1 commits a
traffic infraction.
[PL 2005, c. 577, §34 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 2005, c. 577, §34 (NEW).

So, the real question that needs to be answered when evaluating the current law is, does the vehicle meet the standards set forth in the Maine Motor Vehicle Inspection Manual (MMVIM)? If the vehicle does not meet the standards set forth in the MMVIM it cannot be registered or operated on a public way. The MMVIM carries the weight of law, as Title 29-A section 1769 grants authority to the Chief of the Maine State Police to adopt rules for the administration and enforcement of Chapter 15. The MMVIM are those rules promulgated by that statute and The Maine Administrative Procedure Act. The BMV is obligated to recall any registrations that are issued to vehicles improperly or illegally, once the issue is brought to their attention. To assert that you have already registered a vehicle one or more times is not a defense to a clear violation of law. Also, to assert that vehicle has passed an inspection one or more times is not accurate, it may have received an inspection sticker in error, but it couldn’t have passed an inspection if the vehicle does not meet the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, The EPA pollutant requirements, or the NHTSA DOT crash testing standards. A vehicle registered in error (contrary to law) or a vehicle that received an inspection sticker in error does not guarantee the owner of the vehicle rights to operate an “off road vehicle” on a public way. Once the error is discovered it must be remedied by immediately withdrawing the registration and removing the inspection sticker. The BMV nor the State Police has the authority to allow anyone to violate the law, so we cannot grant exceptions or grant extensions. This decision is not based on new laws or rules nor is arbitrary or capricious. The laws governing “off road vehicles” has been on the books for over a decade. There have been several instances over the years that I am aware of, where BMV has been forced to withdraw registrations based on similar circumstances.

MMVIM
16 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
222 BUREAU OF STATE POLICE
SECTION 170: CLASSES A & E MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTION STANDARDS
SUMMARY: This section describes the inspection procedures, standards, and parts of the vehicle that must be inspected for class A and E vehicles. This section also establishes the standards for rejecting the vehicles for inspection. All vehicles inspected in the State of Maine must have met all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, Environmental Protection Agency pollutant requirements and National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration crash testing requirements at the time of manufacture, unless otherwise authorized by law.


The legal process through NHTSA to import these vehicles into the country is irrelevant. That is a federal exemption for importation but does not affect the laws of each state that govern the registration and inspections of said vehicles.

In closing, the legislature this year voted to enact LD 1433 which added clarity to the law that already existed and strengthens our opinion. It is worth repeating, that bill does not change the current law, it only added language to the definitions in statute to clarify what an “off road vehicle” is. It further clarifies that an “off road vehicle” can’t be registered as an antique auto, antique motorcycle, a custom vehicle or a passenger car. That law becomes effective on October 18th this year but doesn’t change the current requirements and therefore waiting until October 18th to comply is not an option that can be offered by the BMV or the State Police.


With respect,

Lt. Bruce Scott

Lt. Bruce Scott
Commander, Traffic Safety Unit
Maine State Police
I'm still so angry about this. Even more angry reading that they cannot pass Maine safety inspections as a reason why, because mine just did pass. Not in error, either.
 
A guy that lives along my running route just switched his imported Defender to Mass plates, but his FJ40 is still on Maine ones so it must be US market.
 
According to the way it's worded it seems like pre-1968 imports are still legal given they *pass* the non-existent FMVSS and EPA regs so I wouldn't be holding my breath for rich dudes with euro cars to lobby. Show and display is still legal under this wording as well.
 
things will get interesting when they start going after the 100K Defender folks, or the 60K FJs. I agree @WantaDelica, seems like the divide and conquer strategy with a bit of CYA (cover yo ass) sprinkled on top.
 
It will be very interesting to see if owners of MGs, Rovers, Toyota Hiaces and JDM Land Cruisers start getting their stuff taken away. This whole thing is super-duper strange. Did this come in as email or was this a letter?
 
The particularly f'd up part is that they are saying the new wording isn't a new law; it is simply clarifying the old law so there is no delayed implementation.

But this part has been on the books since at least 2013.
"all vehicles must have met the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, EPA Pollutant requirements and NHTSA crash testing at the time of manufacture to pass a Maine inspection. Unless the vehicle is otherwise exempted by law." Obviously it means exempted by Maine law...
because mine just did pass. Not in error, either.
So yeah, it was passed in error... because the inspection item is FMVSS/EPA/NHTSA certification as applicable for that year.
 
The particularly f'd up part is that they are saying the new wording isn't a new law; it is simply clarifying the old law so there is no delayed implementation.

But this part has been on the books since at least 2013.
"all vehicles must have met the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, EPA Pollutant requirements and NHTSA crash testing at the time of manufacture to pass a Maine inspection. Unless the vehicle is otherwise exempted by law." Obviously it means exempted by Maine law...

So yeah, it was passed in error... because the inspection item is FMVSS/EPA/NHTSA certification as applicable for that year.
I hear what you are saying, but the inspection stations are provided no mechanism by which to verify FMVSS/EPA/NHTSA certification as applicable for whatever year for whichever vehicle. They inspect vehicles that have issued plates with non-expired stickers. I'm not looking to argue, but the state is putting things into the inspection requirements that inspection stations do not/cannot inspect.
 
but the state is putting things into the inspection requirements that inspection stations do not/cannot inspect.
Well, NHTSA does the vehicle/crash testing and issues the FMVSS rules; and if a vehicle was certified as having met those requirements it will have a plate in the door frame. So that is actually very simple to inspect, but impossible for a gray market import to meet.

The only way a gray market vehicle will be legal in Maine is if it is imported under the rules applicable to vehicles less than 25 yrs old... or if it's just passing through.
 
sk66 is correct. It's a plate in the door frame. Federalized vehicles will have paperwork stating they meet the requirement per their respective docket number.
 
sk66 is correct. It's a plate in the door frame. Federalized vehicles will have paperwork stating they meet the requirement per their respective docket number.
Appreciate the input. The safety inspection for the State of Maine does not require verifying a FMVSS sticker is present as part of the inspection. If they did, this would be much hotter. And I don't think they can inspect emissions off the sticker, but ok. So who is in charge of verifying this information then? If there's not a box to check at the inspection station, then is the state abdicating their responsibility by making an unchecked requirement as law.
 
Thank goodness for all these public servants we employ to keep us safe from ourselves. Isn't Maine one of the last states where you can build without or with very minimal permits?

This underlines the problem of having such convoluted laws -- at some point anyone can get a bug up their ass and find a way to eliminate something that they deem annoying for whatever reason. Why do we keep doing this to ourselves?

</rant>

I feel for you guys. Please continue to raise awareness and maybe something will come of all this.
 
Here is the lawyer I used to give me an overview and poke the bear a bit a few weeks back.

Young and interested in this topic. Specializes in BMV. Used to be a lobbyist in DC. Guessing if someone threw enough money at him he may bite. Also said he had never seen anything like this.

Andrew C. Strosahl, Esq.
Attorney at Law
<Lawrence Law Logo.jpg>

The Lawrence Law Firm, PA
243 Main Street
PO Box 310
South Berwick, ME 03908

O: 207-384-5105
F: 207-384-5106

WWW.LAWRENCELAWME.COM
 
Last edited:
Top